Re: [linux-dvb] general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28

2009-02-02 Thread Chris Mayo
Andy Walls wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 23:38 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote: >> Andy Walls wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 15:01 +, Chris Mayo wrote: > >>> So tuner_addr is non-NULL and is not a valid pointer either. >>> >>> It looks like linux/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget.c:frontend_init()

Re: [linux-dvb] general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28

2009-02-01 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 23:38 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote: > Andy Walls wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 15:01 +, Chris Mayo wrote: > > So tuner_addr is non-NULL and is not a valid pointer either. > > > > It looks like linux/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget.c:frontend_init() is > > setting the po

Re: [linux-dvb] general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28

2009-02-01 Thread Oliver Endriss
Andy Walls wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 15:01 +, Chris Mayo wrote: > > > I've been seeing general protection fault's with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 > > > (gentoo-sources, amd64) used with vdr. Unfortunately I can't reproduce > > > them on demand. > > > > > > > Two more of these with 2.6.28 so I swi

Re: [linux-dvb] general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28

2009-02-01 Thread Andy Walls
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 15:01 +, Chris Mayo wrote: > > I've been seeing general protection fault's with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 > > (gentoo-sources, amd64) used with vdr. Unfortunately I can't reproduce > > them on demand. > > > > Two more of these with 2.6.28 so I switched back to 2.6.25 and now fou