Hi Koen,
On Monday 23 May 2011 10:55:53 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 23 mei 2011, om 10:00 heeft Laurent Pinchart het volgende geschreven:
> > On Monday 23 May 2011 09:01:07 javier Martin wrote:
> >> On 20 May 2011 17:57, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> In previous patch sets we put that in a seperate file
> >>>
Op 23 mei 2011, om 10:00 heeft Laurent Pinchart het volgende geschreven:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Monday 23 May 2011 09:01:07 javier Martin wrote:
>> On 20 May 2011 17:57, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> In previous patch sets we put that in a seperate file
>>> (omap3beagle-camera.c) so we don't clutter up the
Hi Javier,
On Monday 23 May 2011 09:01:07 javier Martin wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 17:57, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > In previous patch sets we put that in a seperate file
> > (omap3beagle-camera.c) so we don't clutter up the board file with all
> > the different sensor drivers. Would it make sense to do t
On 20 May 2011 17:57, Koen Kooi wrote:
> In previous patch sets we put that in a seperate file (omap3beagle-camera.c)
> so we don't clutter up the board file with all the different sensor drivers.
> Would it make sense to do the same with the current patches? It looks like
> MCF cuts down a lot
Op 20 mei 2011, om 15:47 heeft Javier Martin het volgende geschreven:
> isp.h file has to be included as a temporal measure
> since clocks of the isp are not exposed yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 127 ++-
Javi
