On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:08:37PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday 11 Sep 2015 14:50:30 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > The struct vb2_dc_buf contains two struct sg_table fields: sgt_base and
> > dma_sgt. The former is used by DMA-BUF buffers whereas
Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 11 Sep 2015 14:50:30 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> The struct vb2_dc_buf contains two struct sg_table fields: sgt_base and
> dma_sgt. The former is used by DMA-BUF buffers whereas the latter is used
> by USERPTR.
>
> Unify the two, leaving dma_sgt.
Looks go
Hi Hans,
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 01:50 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> The struct vb2_dc_buf contains two struct sg_table fields: sgt_base and
>> dma_sgt. The former is used by DMA-BUF buffers whereas the latter is used
>> by USERPTR.
>>
>> Unify the two, leaving dma_sgt.
>>
>> MMAP buffers
On 09/11/2015 01:50 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> The struct vb2_dc_buf contains two struct sg_table fields: sgt_base and
> dma_sgt. The former is used by DMA-BUF buffers whereas the latter is used
> by USERPTR.
>
> Unify the two, leaving dma_sgt.
>
> MMAP buffers do not need cache flushing since the
The struct vb2_dc_buf contains two struct sg_table fields: sgt_base and
dma_sgt. The former is used by DMA-BUF buffers whereas the latter is used
by USERPTR.
Unify the two, leaving dma_sgt.
MMAP buffers do not need cache flushing since they have been allocated
using dma_alloc_coherent().
Signed-
