On Sun February 10 2013 17:16:30 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I found the bug. It's my fault: I made a logic error w.r.t. setting
> > up
> > the initial hflip/vflip values. I've read over it dozens of times without
> > actually ca
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Thanks, I found the bug. It's my fault: I made a logic error w.r.t. setting up
> the initial hflip/vflip values. I've read over it dozens of times without
> actually catching the - rather obvious - bug :-)
>
> Get the latest code, try again
On Sun February 10 2013 15:46:05 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > I've improved this message, so please run again with the latest code and
> > let me
> > know what it says. I don't understand all the upside-down problems...
> >
>
> $ dmesg |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> I've improved this message, so please run again with the latest code and let
> me
> know what it says. I don't understand all the upside-down problems...
>
$ dmesg | grep upside
upside down: 0 -1 -1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
On Sat February 9 2013 12:22:12 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the testing! I've pushed some more improvements to my git branch.
> > Hopefully the compliance tests are now running OK. Please check the dmesg
> > output as well.
> >
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Thanks for the testing! I've pushed some more improvements to my git branch.
> Hopefully the compliance tests are now running OK. Please check the dmesg
> output as well.
>
> In addition I've added an 'upside down' message to the kernel log
On Thu February 7 2013 23:39:58 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > I've improved v4l2-compliance a bit, but I've also pushed a fix (I hope) to
> > my git branch.
> >
> > It's great if you can test this!
> >
Thanks for the testing! I've pushed so
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> I've improved v4l2-compliance a bit, but I've also pushed a fix (I hope) to
> my git branch.
>
> It's great if you can test this!
>
$ v4l2-compliance -d /dev/video0
Driver Info:
Driver name : stk
Card type : stk
On Tue February 5 2013 19:41:31 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Buffer ioctls:
> > fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(132): ret != -1
>
> I need to look into this a bit more. I probably need to improve
> v4l2-compliance
> itself so I get better feedback as to which error is actually returned here.
On Tue February 5 2013 18:08:31 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tue February 5 2013 16:28:17 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have tested the patches using STK-1135 webcam. Eve
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Tue February 5 2013 16:28:17 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
>>>
>>> I have tested the patches using STK-1135 webcam. Everything works well.
>>>
>>> $ v4l2-compliance -d /dev/video0
>>> Dr
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tue February 5 2013 16:28:17 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Arvydas,
>> >
>> > Yes indeed, it would be great if you could test this!
>> >
>> > Note that the patch series is also
On Tue February 5 2013 16:28:17 Arvydas Sidorenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arvydas,
> >
> > Yes indeed, it would be great if you could test this!
> >
> > Note that the patch series is also available in my git tree:
> >
> > http://git.linuxtv.org/hverk
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Hi Arvydas,
>
> Yes indeed, it would be great if you could test this!
>
> Note that the patch series is also available in my git tree:
>
> http://git.linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git/shortlog/refs/heads/stkwebcam
>
> Besides the normal tes
On Mon February 4 2013 14:23:55 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > This patch series updates this driver to the control framework, switches
> > it to unlocked_ioctl, fixes a variety of V4L2 compliance issues.
> >
> > It compiles, but t
Hello Hans,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This patch series updates this driver to the control framework, switches
> it to unlocked_ioctl, fixes a variety of V4L2 compliance issues.
>
> It compiles, but to my knowledge nobody has hardware to test this :-(
>
> If anyone has
Hi,
On 02/04/2013 01:36 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
This patch series updates this driver to the control framework, switches
it to unlocked_ioctl, fixes a variety of V4L2 compliance issues.
Good stuff!
It compiles, but to my knowledge nobody has hardware to test this :-(
If anyone has hardware
This patch series updates this driver to the control framework, switches
it to unlocked_ioctl, fixes a variety of V4L2 compliance issues.
It compiles, but to my knowledge nobody has hardware to test this :-(
If anyone has hardware to test this, please let me know!
Regards,
Hans
--
To u
18 matches
Mail list logo
