Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] davinci: convert to core-assisted locking

2011-01-06 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 06-01-2011 08:17, Nori, Sekhar escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:10:07, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: >> Tested for SD loopback and other IOCTLS. Reviewed the patches. >> >> Patch series Acked by: Manjunath Hadli > > Shall I add these two patches as well to the pull request

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] davinci: convert to core-assisted locking

2011-01-06 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Mauro, On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:10:07, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > Tested for SD loopback and other IOCTLS. Reviewed the patches. > > Patch series Acked by: Manjunath Hadli Shall I add these two patches as well to the pull request I sent yesterday[1]? These changes are localized to th

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] davinci: convert to core-assisted locking

2011-01-05 Thread Hadli, Manjunath
Tested for SD loopback and other IOCTLS. Reviewed the patches. Patch series Acked by: Manjunath Hadli -Manju On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 22:12:38, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > These two patches convert vpif_capture and vpif_display to core-assisted > locking and now use .unlocked_ioctl instead of .ioc

[RFC PATCH 0/2] davinci: convert to core-assisted locking

2011-01-05 Thread Hans Verkuil
These two patches convert vpif_capture and vpif_display to core-assisted locking and now use .unlocked_ioctl instead of .ioctl. These patches assume that the 'DaVinci VPIF: Support for DV preset and DV timings' patch series was applied first. See: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.ker