Em Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:21:50 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Tue January 29 2013 18:51:46 Frank Schäfer wrote:
> > Am 29.01.2013 10:49, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > > This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
> > > combined two things: this fix and the change where TR
On Tue January 29 2013 18:51:46 Frank Schäfer wrote:
> Am 29.01.2013 10:49, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
> > combined two things: this fix and the change where TRY_FMT would no
> > longer return -EINVAL for unsupported pixelformat
Am 29.01.2013 10:49, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
> combined two things: this fix and the change where TRY_FMT would no
> longer return -EINVAL for unsupported pixelformats. The latter change was
> rejected (correctly), but we all f
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
> combined two things: this fix and the change where TRY_FMT would no
> longer return -EINVAL for unsupported pixelformats. The latter change was
> rejected (correctly), b
This was part of my original em28xx patch series. That particular patch
combined two things: this fix and the change where TRY_FMT would no
longer return -EINVAL for unsupported pixelformats. The latter change was
rejected (correctly), but we all forgot about the second part of the patch
which fixe
