Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, September 13, 2010 14:15:00 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Matti J. Aaltonen
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > > Anyway the difference between t

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Matti J. Aaltonen
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > > blocks is small. And I do

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > > "completely raw" format.

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Matti J. Aaltonen
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the "raw" > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the > > "completely raw" format. > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it e

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, September 13, 2010 12:50:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 14:10 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > There are also up to three ways the RDS data can be received/sent: either as > > RDS blocks, or using controls, or as a completely raw bitstream. The latter > > is > > u

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-13 Thread Matti J. Aaltonen
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 14:10 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > There are also up to three ways the RDS data can be received/sent: either as > RDS blocks, or using controls, or as a completely raw bitstream. The latter is > unlikely to be used for RDS output, but a cheap RDS receiver might just do >

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-11 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, August 30, 2010 13:38:18 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > Hi again, > > and thanks for the comments. > I've left the audio codec out of this patch set. > > Hans wrote: > > > In principle yes, but we haven't yet decided to implement those now, at > > > the moment the RDS interpretation is lef

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-09-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday, August 30, 2010 13:38:18 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote: > Hi again, > > and thanks for the comments. > I've left the audio codec out of this patch set. > > Hans wrote: > > > In principle yes, but we haven't yet decided to implement those now, at > > > the moment the RDS interpretation is lef

[PATCH v9 0/4] FM Radio driver.

2010-08-30 Thread Matti J. Aaltonen
Hi again, and thanks for the comments. I've left the audio codec out of this patch set. Hans wrote: > > In principle yes, but we haven't yet decided to implement those now, at > > the moment the RDS interpretation is left completely to user space > > applications. > > Matti, is it even possible