Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:49:59AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Mauro, > > since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer > and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you > OK in it going through Boris' tree? Sorry I resent

[PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through Boris' tree? Boris, provided the outcome of the above maintainer's preference for you to merge these please

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:57:12PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:20:19 -0700 > "Luis R. Rodriguez" escreveu: > > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > > > Mauro, > > > > since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer > > and depends on an x86 symbol tha

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-08 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:20:19 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" escreveu: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Mauro, > > since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer > and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you > OK in it going through Boris' tree? Sure. I just fi

[PATCH v6 0/3] linux: address broken PAT drivers

2015-06-08 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Mauro, since the ivtv patch is already acked by the driver maintainer and depends on an x86 symbol that went through Boris' tree are you OK in it going through Boris' tree? Boris, provided the outcome of the above maintainer's preference for you to merge these please