* Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Well they've helped me with some of the changes and contributed some
> code and/or fixes, but if acked-by is preferred I'll use that..
Such contributions can be credited in the changelog, and/or copyright
notices, and/or the code itself. The signoff chain on the o
Op 20-06-13 13:55, Ingo Molnar schreef:
> * Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
>> Changes since RFC patch v1:
>> - Updated to use atomic_long instead of atomic, since the reservation_id
>> was a long.
>> - added mutex_reserve_lock_slow and mutex_reserve_lock_intr_slow
>> - removed mutex_locked_set_res
* Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> +The algorithm that TTM came up with for dealing with this problem is quite
> +simple. [...]
'TTM' here reads like a person - but in reality it's the TTM graphics
subsystem, right?
Please clarify this portion of the text.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe f
* Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Changes since RFC patch v1:
> - Updated to use atomic_long instead of atomic, since the reservation_id was
> a long.
> - added mutex_reserve_lock_slow and mutex_reserve_lock_intr_slow
> - removed mutex_locked_set_reservation_id (or w/e it was called)
> Changes si
Changes since RFC patch v1:
- Updated to use atomic_long instead of atomic, since the reservation_id was a
long.
- added mutex_reserve_lock_slow and mutex_reserve_lock_intr_slow
- removed mutex_locked_set_reservation_id (or w/e it was called)
Changes since RFC patch v2:
- remove use of __mutex