Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] v4l: Document timestamp behaviour to correspond to reality

2013-08-28 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Hans, Thanks for the comments. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Mon 26 August 2013 01:02:01 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Document that monotonic timestamps are taken after the corresponding frame > > has been received, not when the reception has begun. This corresp

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] v4l: Document timestamp behaviour to correspond to reality

2013-08-28 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Mon 26 August 2013 01:02:01 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Document that monotonic timestamps are taken after the corresponding frame > has been received, not when the reception has begun. This corresponds to the > reality of current drivers: the timestamp is naturally taken when the > hardware triggers

[PATCH v4 1/3] v4l: Document timestamp behaviour to correspond to reality

2013-08-25 Thread Sakari Ailus
Document that monotonic timestamps are taken after the corresponding frame has been received, not when the reception has begun. This corresponds to the reality of current drivers: the timestamp is naturally taken when the hardware triggers an interrupt to tell the driver to handle the received fram