On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> My conclusion of the dma_alloc_noncoherent() and dma_cache_sync() API
> when it was introduced is that it's basically a completely broken
> interface, and I've never seen any point to it. Maybe some of that is
> because it
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:13:28PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 2017-07-05 19:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:27:32AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>The main question here if we want to merge incomplete solution or not. As
> >>for now, there
Hi Christoph,
On 2017-07-05 19:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:27:32AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
The main question here if we want to merge incomplete solution or not. As
for now, there is no support in ARM/ARM64 for NON_CONSISTENT attribute.
Also none of the v4l2 d
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:27:32AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> The main question here if we want to merge incomplete solution or not. As
> for now, there is no support in ARM/ARM64 for NON_CONSISTENT attribute.
> Also none of the v4l2 drivers use it. Sadly support for NON_CONSISTENT
> attribut
Hi All,
On 2016-10-26 10:52, Thierry Escande wrote:
This series adds support for cacheable MMAP in DMA coherent allocator.
The first patch moves the vb2_dc_get_base_sgt() function above mmap
callbacks for calls introduced by the second patch. This avoids a
forward declaration.
I'm sorry for l
Hi,
This series adds support for cacheable MMAP in DMA coherent allocator.
The first patch moves the vb2_dc_get_base_sgt() function above mmap
callbacks for calls introduced by the second patch. This avoids a
forward declaration.
Changes in v2:
- Put function move in a separate patch
- Added com
