On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
>> sh_mobile_ceu can support "field signal" from external module.
>> To support this operation, SH_CEU_FLAG_USE_FLDID_{HIGH, LOW}
>> are added to header.
>
> I never dealt with interlaced
Dear Guennadi
> I'll hold off on both these SOCAM_FIELD_ID_* patches until we have
> clarified this, ok?
I'm so sorry for very slowly response.
> like with other control signals, where if both partners are freely
> configurable, then any polarity can be used; if one is configurable and
> ano
I'll hold off on both these SOCAM_FIELD_ID_* patches until we have
clarified this, ok?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> > sh_mobile_ceu can support "field signal" from external module.
> > To support this operat
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> sh_mobile_ceu can support "field signal" from external module.
> To support this operation, SH_CEU_FLAG_USE_FLDID_{HIGH, LOW}
> are added to header.
I never dealt with interlaced video, so, I probably just don't understand
something, please explain.
sh_mobile_ceu can support "field signal" from external module.
To support this operation, SH_CEU_FLAG_USE_FLDID_{HIGH, LOW}
are added to header.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto
---
v1 -> v2
o field name fix
drivers/media/video/sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c |7 +++
include/media/sh_mobile_ceu.
