Hi Sakari,
On 02/05/2012 10:04 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> I wanted to keep the target numbers the same since we're still using
>>> exactly the same as the V4L2.
>>
>> You're right, keeping the numbers same for subdevs and regular video
>> nodes may be important. I'm wondering whether we should us
Hi Sylwester,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:37:38PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 02/04/2012 09:30 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_FLAG_SIZE_GE (1<< 0)
> >>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_FLAG_SIZE_LE (1<< 1)
> >>> +#define V4L2_SU
Hi Sakari,
On 02/04/2012 09:30 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_FLAG_SIZE_GE (1<< 0)
>>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_FLAG_SIZE_LE (1<< 1)
>>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG (1<< 2)
>>> +
>>> +/* active cropping
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the comments!!
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 12:54 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Add support for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION
>> IOCTLs. They replace functionality provided by VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP and
>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP IOCTLs and
On 02/03/2012 12:54 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add support for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION
> IOCTLs. They replace functionality provided by VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP and
> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP IOCTLs and also add new functionality (composing).
>
> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP and VID
Add support for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION
IOCTLs. They replace functionality provided by VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP and
VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP IOCTLs and also add new functionality (composing).
VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP continue to be supported.
Signed-of
