On Fri, 9 May 2014, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Seems like it's not in linux-next as of today, so I am taking
> > it now. Thanks,
>
> I still do not see this patch in torvalds branch... So what is
> needed to include this security buffer overflow patch into
> mainline & stable kernels?
I picked it u
On 05/09/2014 06:10 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 05 May 2014 15:34:29 Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> From: Pali Rohár
>>>
>>> This patch fixes an off by one check in
>>> bcm2048_set_region().
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohá
On Monday 05 May 2014 15:34:29 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > From: Pali Rohár
> >
> > This patch fixes an off by one check in
> > bcm2048_set_region().
> >
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
> > Sig
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> From: Pali Rohár
>
> This patch fixes an off by one check in bcm2048_set_region().
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
> ---
> v2: Send it to the correct list. Re
From: Pali Rohár
This patch fixes an off by one check in bcm2048_set_region().
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
v2: Send it to the correct list. Re-work the changelog.
This patch has been floating around for f
From: Pali Rohár
This patch fixes an off by one check in bcm2048_set_region().
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
v2: Send it to the correct list. Re-work the changelog.
This patch has been floating around for f
