On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Ezequiel García wrote:
> Hi Jarod,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
>> So yeah, ok, I'm fine with this. Haven't tested it with actual raw IR
>> hardware, but I don't see any reason it wouldn't work.
>>
>> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
>
> Tha
Hi Jarod,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> So yeah, ok, I'm fine with this. Haven't tested it with actual raw IR
> hardware, but I don't see any reason it wouldn't work.
>
> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
Thanks for the feedback.
I have a paranoid question: Is it ok to solve thi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:53:49PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> This changes rc_core to not load the IR decoders at load time,
> postponing it to load only if a RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW device is
> registered via rc_register_device.
> We use a static boolean variable, to ensure decoders modules
> are o
This changes rc_core to not load the IR decoders at load time,
postponing it to load only if a RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW device is
registered via rc_register_device.
We use a static boolean variable, to ensure decoders modules
are only loaded once.
Tested with rc-loopback device only.
Signed-off-by: Ezequ
