On 24 February 2015 at 09:41, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 06:00 PM, Miguel Casas-Sanchez wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> go for it if you feel it's the best approach. Are you planning to add
>> multiplanar formats? Particularly, I'm interested in YUV420M and its
>> twin evil brother YVU420M.
>
>
On 02/24/2015 06:00 PM, Miguel Casas-Sanchez wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> go for it if you feel it's the best approach. Are you planning to add
> multiplanar formats? Particularly, I'm interested in YUV420M and its
> twin evil brother YVU420M.
Certainly. I'm planning to add all those YUV420 variants. On
Hi Hans,
go for it if you feel it's the best approach. Are you planning to add
multiplanar formats? Particularly, I'm interested in YUV420M and its
twin evil brother YVU420M.
I would recommend adding support for a less-common format such as
YUV410 (or variation thereof). Since this format is so d
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the patch. However, after reviewing it and testing it
I decided to implement my own version. Partially because several
features were still failing (crop/compose/scale), partially because
I didn't like the way the tpg was changed: too much change basically.
Yesterday I added
This is the second attempt at creating a patch doing
that while respecting the pattern movements, crops,
and other artifacts that can be added to the generated
frames.
Hope it addresses Hans' comments on the first patch.
It should create properly moving patterns, border,
square and noise. SAV/EA
