Hi Gueannadi,
On 07/24/2013 01:26 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>
>> > This is a purely cosmetic change. Since the 'subdev' member
>> > points to an array of subdevs it seems more intuitive to name
>> > it in plural form.
>
> Well, I was aware o
Hi Sylwester
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> This is a purely cosmetic change. Since the 'subdev' member
> points to an array of subdevs it seems more intuitive to name
> it in plural form.
Well, I was aware of the fact, that "subdev" is an array and that the
plural form of "su
Hi Prabhakar,
On 07/23/2013 05:50 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
> wrote:
>> This is a purely cosmetic change. Since the 'subdev' member
>> points to an array of subdevs it seems more intuitive to name
>> it in plural form.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Syl
Hi Sylwester,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
> This is a purely cosmetic change. Since the 'subdev' member
> points to an array of subdevs it seems more intuitive to name
> it in plural form.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
> ---
This is a purely cosmetic change. Since the 'subdev' member
points to an array of subdevs it seems more intuitive to name
it in plural form.
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c |2 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-
