Em Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:12:31 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Em Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:18:22 +0100
> > Sebastian Hesselbarth escreveu:
> >> On 02/06/2013 02:48 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> > On 02/06/2013 09:03 AM, Seb
On 02/06/2013 06:18 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- linux,allowed-rc-protocols: Linux specific u64 bitmask of allowed
>>> +rc protocols.
>>
>> You likely need to specify in these bindings documentation which bit
>> corresponds to which RC protocol.
>>
>
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:18:22 +0100
> Sebastian Hesselbarth escreveu:
>> On 02/06/2013 02:48 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> > On 02/06/2013 09:03 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> >> This patch adds device tree parsing for gpio_ir_
Em Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:18:22 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth escreveu:
> On 02/06/2013 02:48 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 02/06/2013 09:03 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >> This patch adds device tree parsing for gpio_ir_recv platform_data and
> >> the mandatory binding documentation. It
On 02/06/2013 02:48 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 02/06/2013 09:03 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
This patch adds device tree parsing for gpio_ir_recv platform_data and
the mandatory binding documentation. It basically follows what we already
have for e.g. gpio_keys. All required device tre
Hi,
On 02/06/2013 09:03 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This patch adds device tree parsing for gpio_ir_recv platform_data and
> the mandatory binding documentation. It basically follows what we already
> have for e.g. gpio_keys. All required device tree properties are OS
> independent but opti
