Re: [PATCH 6/7] IR: extend ir_raw_event and do refactoring

2010-09-02 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:20:54AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Also in the future I think I should make the > ir_raw_event_store_with_filter the default submit function for all > drivers, and then I could drop that silly '_with_filter" thing > (Couldn't think for a better name for this function.

Re: [PATCH 6/7] IR: extend ir_raw_event and do refactoring

2010-09-02 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 22:56 +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52:26AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Add new event types for timeout & carrier report > > Move timeout handling from ir_raw_event_store_with_filter to > > ir-lirc-codec, where it is really needed. > > Yes, b

Re: [PATCH 6/7] IR: extend ir_raw_event and do refactoring

2010-09-02 Thread David Härdeman
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52:26AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Add new event types for timeout & carrier report > Move timeout handling from ir_raw_event_store_with_filter to > ir-lirc-codec, where it is really needed. Yes, but it still might make more sense to keep the timeout handling in ir_

[PATCH 6/7] IR: extend ir_raw_event and do refactoring

2010-08-30 Thread Maxim Levitsky
Add new event types for timeout & carrier report Move timeout handling from ir_raw_event_store_with_filter to ir-lirc-codec, where it is really needed. Now lirc bridge ensures proper gap handling. Extend lirc bridge for carrier & timeout reports Note: all new ir_raw_event variables now should be i