Hi Mauro,
On 2018-03-06 06:24, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> As patches 1 and 2 are independent of this one, and should be backward
> compatible, I'm applying them, but I have issues with this one too :-)
>
> Em Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:48:35 -0600
> Brad Love escreveu:
>
>> On 2018-01-
Hi Brad,
As patches 1 and 2 are independent of this one, and should be backward
compatible, I'm applying them, but I have issues with this one too :-)
Em Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:48:35 -0600
Brad Love escreveu:
> On 2018-01-15 23:05, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> > Hello
> > So the use case is to share s
On 2018-01-15 23:05, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Hello
> So the use case is to share single tuner with multiple demodulators?
> Why don't just register single tuner and pass that info to multiple
> demods?
>
> Antti
Hello Antti,
It was done this way because of lack of knowledge of other ways. The
m
Hello
So the use case is to share single tuner with multiple demodulators? Why
don't just register single tuner and pass that info to multiple demods?
Antti
On 01/12/2018 06:19 PM, Brad Love wrote:
Add ability to share a tuner amongst demodulators. Addtional
demods are attached using hybrid_t
Add ability to share a tuner amongst demodulators. Addtional
demods are attached using hybrid_tuner_instance_list.
The changes are equivalent to moving all of probe to _attach.
Results are backwards compatible with current usage.
If the tuner is acquired via attach, then .release cleans state.
if
