Em Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:47:23 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 17:34:46 EET Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:05:46 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:02:02 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
Hi Mauro,
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 17:34:46 EET Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:05:46 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:02:02 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:39:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>> On Mon, De
Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:17:12 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 17:37:58 EET Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:12:35 +0200 Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> An
Hi Mauro,
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 17:37:58 EET Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:12:35 +0200 Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> And furthermore using enum types in the uAPI is a bad idea as the enum
> >> size i
Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:12:35 +0200
Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > And furthermore using enum types in the uAPI is a bad idea as the enum size
> > is
> > architecture-dependent. That's why we use integer types in st
Em Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:05:46 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:02:02 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:39:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:53:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> And furthermore using enum types in the uAPI is a bad idea as the enum size
> is
> architecture-dependent. That's why we use integer types in structures used as
> ioctl arguments.
I guess we have an argeement on th
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:02:02 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:39:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:53:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > The V4L2_DEV_DEBUG_IOCTL macros actually define a bitmask,
> > > but
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:39:27 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:53:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The V4L2_DEV_DEBUG_IOCTL macros actually define a bitmask,
> > but without using Kernel's modern standards. Also,
> > documentation looks akward.
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:53:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The V4L2_DEV_DEBUG_IOCTL macros actually define a bitmask,
> but without using Kernel's modern standards. Also,
> documentation looks akward.
>
> So, convert them into an enum with valid bits, adding
> the correspo
The V4L2_DEV_DEBUG_IOCTL macros actually define a bitmask,
but without using Kernel's modern standards. Also,
documentation looks akward.
So, convert them into an enum with valid bits, adding
the correspoinding kernel-doc documentation for it.
In order to avoid possible conflicts, rename them fro
11 matches
Mail list logo