Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Em Sat, 2 May 2009 09:12:11 +0200 Jean Delvare escreveu: > Mauro, please pull Mike's pvrusb2-dev work as soon as he asks you to do > so. Then I'll rebase my own patch set and send it again. Jean and Mike, Any news about this subject? Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Hi Mike, Sorry for not answering your previous post... On Fri, 1 May 2009 20:30:48 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > Jean: > > I have another idea that I think you'll like. I'm putting the finishing > touches on the patch right now. > > What I have implements correct ir_video loading for the p

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Jean: I have another idea that I think you'll like. I'm putting the finishing touches on the patch right now. What I have implements correct ir_video loading for the pvrusb2 driver. It also includes a lookup table (though with only 1 entry right now) to determine the proper I2C address and

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Hi Jean, I had actually written out a longer, detailed, point-by-point reply earlier today, but before I could finish it I got interrupted with a crisis. And then another. And that's kind of how my day went. Now I'm finally back to this, but I have another e-mail debacle to immediately dea

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Hi Mike, Sorry for the late answer. On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:53:35 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hmm, I thought that our latest discussions had (at least partly) > > > obsoleted your patche

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi again Mike, > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > > > I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since > > > I've already got a change ready

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Hi again Mike, On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > > I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since > > I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to > > take into

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Hi Mike, On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since > I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to > take into account the properties of the hardware device (i.e. only > activate i

Re: [PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to take into account the properties of the hardware device (i.e. only activate ir-kbd-i2c when we know it has a chance of working). -Mike On Fri, 17 Apr

[PATCH 2/6] ir-kbd-i2c: Switch to the new-style device binding model

Let card drivers probe for IR receiver devices and instantiate them if found. Ultimately it would be better if we could stop probing completely, but I suspect this won't be possible for all card types. There's certainly room for cleanups. For example, some drivers are sharing I2C adapter IDs, so t