On 02/27/2017 05:50 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
>
> On 2017-02-24 15:23, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> wrote:
>>> On 2017-02-23 22:43, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> It turned ou
Hi Shuah,
On 2017-02-24 15:23, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
On 2017-02-23 22:43, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
requirement f
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hi Shuah
>
>
>
> On 2017-02-23 22:43, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
>>> requirement for A
Hi Shuah
On 2017-02-23 22:43, Shuah Khan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
requirement for ALL buffers to be allocated on higher addresses than the
firmware base like it was documented for
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
> requirement for ALL buffers to be allocated on higher addresses than the
> firmware base like it was documented for MFC v5. This requirement is true
> only for th
Hello Marek,
On 02/20/2017 10:23 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On 2017-02-17 22:13, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 02/14/2017 04:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
>>> requirement for ALL buffers to be
Hi Javier,
On 2017-02-17 22:13, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 02/14/2017 04:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
requirement for ALL buffers to be allocated on higher addresses than the
firmware base like it was documented
Hello Marek,
On 02/14/2017 04:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
> requirement for ALL buffers to be allocated on higher addresses than the
> firmware base like it was documented for MFC v5. This requirement is true
> only for
It turned out that all versions of MFC v6+ hardware doesn't have a strict
requirement for ALL buffers to be allocated on higher addresses than the
firmware base like it was documented for MFC v5. This requirement is true
only for the device and per-context buffers. All video data buffers can be
all
