On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:54:43 +
Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> The patch failed for the following reason.
>
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 09:43 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > usb_control_msg initiates (and waits for completion of) a dma transfer using
> > the supplied buffer. That buffer thus has to
The patch failed for the following reason.
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 09:43 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> usb_control_msg initiates (and waits for completion of) a dma transfer using
> the supplied buffer. That buffer thus has to be seperately allocated on
> the heap.
>
> In lib/dma_debug.c the func
usb_control_msg initiates (and waits for completion of) a dma transfer using
the supplied buffer. That buffer thus has to be seperately allocated on
the heap.
In lib/dma_debug.c the function check_for_stack even warns about it:
WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
Note: This ch
