Re: [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.

Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 14:37:10 Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > [snip] > Mauro, does this patch make sense to you? It would be good to have your Ack so we can queue this in the series leading to the removal of the ->ioctl

Re: [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.

Hi Hans, On Wednesday 28 April 2010 14:37:10 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: [snip] > >> Mauro, does this patch make sense to you? It would be good to have your > >> Ack so we can queue this in the series leading to the removal of the > >> ->ioctl file operation. We can also do the

Re: [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.

> Hi Arnd, > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 April 2010, John Kacur wrote: >>> Well it is certainly possible that my fixup is not correct too - your >>> patch cannot be correct, because it doesn't compile! Here is what I get >>> when I apply your patch to a recent linus/master >> >> Ah, I

Re: [PATCH 10/10] bkl: Fix-up compile problems as a result of the bkl-pushdown.

Hi Arnd, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 27 April 2010, John Kacur wrote: >> Well it is certainly possible that my fixup is not correct too - your >> patch cannot be correct, because it doesn't compile! Here is what I get >> when I apply your patch to a recent linus/master > > Ah, I see. > >