On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 06:05:44 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 23:31, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 19:21:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> Hi Hans,
> >>
> >> On Monday 22 August 2011 17:52:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 1
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 23:31, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 19:21:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On Monday 22 August 2011 17:52:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 17:42:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > > On Monday 22 August 2011 15:54:03 Gu
On Monday, August 22, 2011 19:21:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Monday 22 August 2011 17:52:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 17:42:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 August 2011 15:54:03 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > We discussed a bit more with
Hi Hans,
On Monday 22 August 2011 17:52:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 17:42:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 22 August 2011 15:54:03 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > We discussed a bit more with Hans on IRC, and below is my attempt of a
> > > summary. Hans, please,
On Monday, August 22, 2011 17:42:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Monday 22 August 2011 15:54:03 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > We discussed a bit more with Hans on IRC, and below is my attempt of a
> > summary. Hans, please, correct me, if I misunderstood anything. Pawel,
> > Sa
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 22 August 2011 15:54:03 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> We discussed a bit more with Hans on IRC, and below is my attempt of a
> summary. Hans, please, correct me, if I misunderstood anything. Pawel,
> Sakari, Laurent: please, reply, whether you're ok with this.
Sakari is on
On Monday, August 22, 2011 15:54:03 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> We discussed a bit more with Hans on IRC, and below is my attempt of a
> summary. Hans, please, correct me, if I misunderstood anything.
Looks good, that's exactly what I meant.
Regards,
Hans
> Pawel,
> Sakari, Laurent
We discussed a bit more with Hans on IRC, and below is my attempt of a
summary. Hans, please, correct me, if I misunderstood anything. Pawel,
Sakari, Laurent: please, reply, whether you're ok with this.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:40:25 Guennadi Liak
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:40:25 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Hans
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > Sorry for starting this discussion and then disappearing. I've been very
> > busy lately, so my apologies for that.
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 18:14:33 Pawel Osc
Hi Hans
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Sorry for starting this discussion and then disappearing. I've been very
> busy lately, so my apologies for that.
>
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 18:14:33 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> > Hi Guennadi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liak
Sorry for starting this discussion and then disappearing. I've been very
busy lately, so my apologies for that.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 18:14:33 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hello,
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:58 PM Pawel Osciak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:22, Marek Szyprowski
> wrote:
> > On Monday, August 15, 2011 3:46 PM Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >> While switching back, I have to change the struct vb2_ops::queue_setup()
> >> operation to take a s
Hi
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:11, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Pawel Osciak wrote:
>
>> Hi Guennadi,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liakhovetski
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wro
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:22, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Monday, August 15, 2011 3:46 PM Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> While switching back, I have to change the struct vb2_ops::queue_setup()
>> operation to take a struct v4l2_create_buffers pointer. An earlier version
>> of this p
Hello,
On Monday, August 15, 2011 3:46 PM Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wro
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:41:51AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > > in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mo
On Wednesday 17 August 2011 11:11:01 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Pawel Osciak wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> > On Monday, Au
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> > This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> > VIDIOC_PREPA
Hi Guennadi,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:13, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> > > Hi Hans
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi Hans
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
[snip]
> > > > but I've changed my mind: I think
> > > > this sh
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Hans
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guennadi!
> > >
> > > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > A possibility to pr
On Monday, August 15, 2011 13:28:23 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Hans
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > Hi Guennadi!
> >
> > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > > in
Hi Hans
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Guennadi!
>
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> > This patch
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:25:24AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:37:27 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:26:30AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > ...
> > > > Wouldn't that be a security issue ? Any application with permissions to
> > > > access
> > >
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:37:27 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:26:30AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> ...
> > > Wouldn't that be a security issue ? Any application with permissions to
> > > access
> > > the video device could DoS the system.
> >
> > How is this any differe
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:26:30AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
...
> > Wouldn't that be a security issue ? Any application with permissions to
> > access
> > the video device could DoS the system.
>
> How is this any different from an application that tries to use more memory
> then there is avai
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 00:06:10 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Monday 08 August 2011 14:40:27 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 August 2011 14:40:27 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
A possibility to prealloca
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 August 2011 14:40:27 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > A possibility to preallocate and ini
On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > > in V4L2 is required for an effi
On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> > This patch adds two new
Hi Guennadi!
On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> VIDIOC_PREPAR
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF and defines respective data structures.
>
>
Hi Guennadi,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 00:47, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF
A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF and defines respective data structures.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
