On Wednesday 16 Mar 2016 09:04:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
> since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
> media graph traversal, it is protected by a mutex.
>
> Solve this conflict by always using a mutex.
>
> As
On 03/16/2016 06:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
> since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
> media graph traversal, it is protected by a mutex.
>
> Solve this conflict by always using a mutex.
>
> As a side ef
Hi Mauro,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:04:02AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
> since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
> media graph traversal, it is protected by a mutex.
>
> Solve this conflict by always usi
Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
media graph traversal, it is protected by a mutex.
Solve this conflict by always using a mutex.
As a side effect, this prevents a bug where the media notifiers
were called at
Em Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:53:12 -0300
Javier Martinez Canillas escreveu:
> Hello Mauro,
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
> > since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
> > media gr
Hello Mauro,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Right now, the lock schema for media_device struct is messy,
> since sometimes, it is protected via a spin lock, while, for
> media graph traversal, it is protected by a mutex.
>
> Solve this conflict by always using a m
