On 08/01/18 23:20, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> While v4l2_i2c_subdev_init does give a unique name to the subdev, matching
> the one appearing in dmesg for messages generated by dev_info and friends
> (e.g. imx185 30-0010), v4l2_spi_subdev_init does a poor job, copying only
> the driver name, but no
While v4l2_i2c_subdev_init does give a unique name to the subdev, matching
the one appearing in dmesg for messages generated by dev_info and friends
(e.g. imx185 30-0010), v4l2_spi_subdev_init does a poor job, copying only
the driver name, but not the dev_name(), yielding e.g. "imx185", but
missing
