Re: [PATCH 1/2] IR/lirc: further ioctl portability fixups

2010-10-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Oct 9, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Joris van Rantwijk wrote: > On Friday, October 08, 2010 23:12:35 Jarod Wilson wrote: >> I've dropped the .compat_ioctl addition from Joris' original patch, >> as I swear the non-compat definition should now work for both 32-bit >> and 64-bit userspace. Technically, I t

Re: [PATCH 1/2] IR/lirc: further ioctl portability fixups

2010-10-09 Thread Joris van Rantwijk
On Friday, October 08, 2010 23:12:35 Jarod Wilson wrote: > I've dropped the .compat_ioctl addition from Joris' original patch, > as I swear the non-compat definition should now work for both 32-bit > and 64-bit userspace. Technically, I think we still need/want a > Signed-off-by: from Joris here. J

[PATCH 1/2] IR/lirc: further ioctl portability fixups

2010-10-08 Thread Jarod Wilson
From: Joris van Rantwijk 8< I tested lirc_serial and found that it works fine. Except the LIRC ioctls do not work in my 64-bit-kernel/32-bit-user setup. I added compat_ioctl entries in the drivers to fix this. While doing so, I noticed inconsistencies in the argument type of the LIRC ioc