Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] soc_camera: mt9t112: Remove empty function

2013-06-05 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 5 June 2013 15:32, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Sachin > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> On 24 May 2013 16:55, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> > After the switch to devm_* functions, the 'remove' function does >> > not do anything. Delete it. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] soc_camera: mt9t112: Remove empty function

2013-06-05 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Sachin On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 24 May 2013 16:55, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > After the switch to devm_* functions, the 'remove' function does > > not do anything. Delete it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > > Cc: Kuninori Morimoto > > --- > > drivers/media/i2c/soc_ca

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] soc_camera: mt9t112: Remove empty function

2013-06-04 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 24 May 2013 16:55, Sachin Kamat wrote: > After the switch to devm_* functions, the 'remove' function does > not do anything. Delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > Cc: Kuninori Morimoto > --- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9t112.c |6 -- > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > d

[PATCH 1/2] [media] soc_camera: mt9t112: Remove empty function

2013-05-24 Thread Sachin Kamat
After the switch to devm_* functions, the 'remove' function does not do anything. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat Cc: Kuninori Morimoto --- drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9t112.c |6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9t112.c b/drivers