On Wednesday 11 January 2012 00:40:43 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 20:14:22 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> Back in the old days there was probably a reason to require that
> >> controls that are being used to access using VIDIOC_{TRY,G,S}_EXT_CT
Hi Hans,
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 20:14:22 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Back in the old days there was probably a reason to require that controls
that are being used to access using VIDIOC_{TRY,G,S}_EXT_CTRLS belonged to
the same class. These days such reason does not exist, or a
Hi Sakari,
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 20:14:22 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Back in the old days there was probably a reason to require that controls
> that are being used to access using VIDIOC_{TRY,G,S}_EXT_CTRLS belonged to
> the same class. These days such reason does not exist, or at least cannot
Back in the old days there was probably a reason to require that controls
that are being used to access using VIDIOC_{TRY,G,S}_EXT_CTRLS belonged to
the same class. These days such reason does not exist, or at least cannot be
remembered, and concrete examples of the opposite can be seen: a single
(
