Hi Guennadi,
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:41:09 +0200 (CEST), Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hm, maybe testing patches between packing and completing a thousand of
> other things was not a very good idea... In any case, I think, it has been
> something in my rootfs. Can it be, that modules, loaded per
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Here's a bunch of patches (on top of staging/v2.6.37) that remove the
> > module_name argument to the v4l2_i2c_new_subdev* functions.
>
> Something seems
Hi Laurent
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here's a bunch of patches (on top of staging/v2.6.37) that remove the
> module_name argument to the v4l2_i2c_new_subdev* functions.
Something seems to be wrong with them. On arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-pcm037.c
without your
Hi everybody,
Here's a bunch of patches (on top of staging/v2.6.37) that remove the
module_name argument to the v4l2_i2c_new_subdev* functions.
The module name is used by those functions to load the module corresponding
to the I2C sub-device being instanciated. As the I2C modules now support
moda
