Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Krufky
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ralph Metzler wrote: > Hi Devin, > > Devin Heitmueller writes: >  > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote: >  > > [PATCH 01/16] tda18271c2dd: Initial check-in >  > > [PATCH 02/16] tda18271c2dd: Lots of coding-style fixes >  > >  > Oliver, >  > >  

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ralph Metzler wrote: >  > Generally speaking with other devices the IF is configured for the >  > tuner depending on the target modulation (there is a tda18271_config >  > struct passed at attach time containing the IF for various modes). >  > Then the demod driver

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Ralph and Devin, Em 11-07-2011 13:27, Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > Hi Ralph, > > Good to hear from you. > >> AFAIR, there were at least 2 reasons. >> One was that the existing driver does not accept 2 (or even 4) tuners with >> the >> same address (but behind different demods) on the same I

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Ralph Metzler
Devin Heitmueller writes: > Hi Ralph, > > Good to hear from you. > > > AFAIR, there were at least 2 reasons. > > One was that the existing driver does not accept 2 (or even 4) tuners with > > the > > same address (but behind different demods) on the same I2C bus which > > is the case on

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Devin Heitmueller
Hi Ralph, Good to hear from you. > AFAIR, there were at least 2 reasons. > One was that the existing driver does not accept 2 (or even 4) tuners with the > same address (but behind different demods) on the same I2C bus which > is the case on duoflex C/T addon cards. Do you mean that you are rely

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Ralph Metzler
Hi Devin, Devin Heitmueller writes: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote: > > [PATCH 01/16] tda18271c2dd: Initial check-in > > [PATCH 02/16] tda18271c2dd: Lots of coding-style fixes > > Oliver, > > Why the new driver for the 18271c2? There is already such a driver, >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-11 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote: > [PATCH 01/16] tda18271c2dd: Initial check-in > [PATCH 02/16] tda18271c2dd: Lots of coding-style fixes Oliver, Why the new driver for the 18271c2? There is already such a driver, and in the past we've rejected multiple drivers for the same

Re: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-07 Thread Oliver Endriss
On Monday 04 July 2011 18:41:10 Hans von Marwijk wrote: > In which GIT or HG repository can I find these patches. They are not in any of my public repositories yet. If you need a working driver, I recommend one of the following repositories: For kernel >= 2.6.32: http://linuxtv.org/hg/~endriss/m

RE: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-04 Thread Hans von Marwijk
1 18:31 > To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > Subject: [PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and > ngene > > [PATCH 01/16] tda18271c2dd: Initial check-in > [PATCH 02/16] tda18271c2dd: Lots of coding-style fixes > [PATCH 03/

[PATCH 00/16] New drivers: DRX-K, TDA18271c2, Updates: CXD2099 and ngene

2011-07-03 Thread Oliver Endriss
[PATCH 01/16] tda18271c2dd: Initial check-in [PATCH 02/16] tda18271c2dd: Lots of coding-style fixes [PATCH 03/16] DRX-K: Initial check-in [PATCH 04/16] DRX-K: Shrink size of drxk_map.h [PATCH 05/16] DRX-K: Tons of coding-style fixes [PATCH 06/16] DRX-K, TDA18271c2: Add build support [PATCH 07/16] g