Em Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:27:48 +0200
Peter Rosin escreveu:
> On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
> >> on failure, but the function already logs suc
On 2017-04-03 10:38, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One
> or two of those users actually add more information than already
> provided by the central failure message.
>
> So, fir
On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
>> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One
>> or two of those users actually add more information
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One
> or two of those users actually add more information than already
> provided by the central failure
Hi!
Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message
on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One
or two of those users actually add more information than already
provided by the central failure message.
So, first fix the central error reporting to provide as much
in