Re: v4l2-subdev Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:18:41PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > If there are other requirements to have i2c initialise early we can well > move it up the chain. I think it would be preferable to modifying each i2c > host adapter driver to use subsys_init(). IIRC there are other orderin

Re: v4l2-subdev Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > break if we move it down right after i2c? Another hackish interim solution > > would be to replace module_init with subsys_init in i2c-sh_mobile.c like > > some other i2c adapte

Re: v4l2-subdev Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > break if we move it down right after i2c? Another hackish interim solution > would be to replace module_init with subsys_init in i2c-sh_mobile.c like > some other i2c adapters do (including MXC, PXA). That's certainly easie

v4l2-subdev Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> Can you please test on your Migo-R board? I'd be happy to assist you > >> in setting up your environment. > > > > I did test it and it worked

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Magnus Damm
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> Can you please test on your Migo-R board? I'd be happy to assist you >> in setting up your environment. > > I did test it and it worked - exactly as you say - with the entire patch > stack +

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > So linux-next fa169db2b277ebafa466d625ed2d16b2d2a4bc82 with > 20090415/series applies without any rejects and compiles just fine for > Migo-R. However, during runtime I experience the same problem as with > 2.6.30-rc plus 0033->0035 + 0036 or v2: > > / #

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Magnus Damm
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 200

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-20 Thread Magnus Damm
Hi Morimoto-san, On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Magnus > >> >> > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next >> >> > history branch, commit ID in -base file. Don't be surprised, that >> >> > patch-set also contains a few not directly

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-19 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Magnus > >> > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next > >> > history branch, commit ID in -base file. Don't be surprised, that > >> > patch-set also contains a few not directly related patches. > >> > >> Testing on Migo-R board with 2.6.30-rc2-git-something and

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > >> wrote: > >> > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski >> wrote: >> > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, >> > review and test. My current patch-stack

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > wrote: > > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, > > review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a > > (manually-created) quilt-seri

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: > >> I've got one more thing to ask. >> Is SoC camera framework supporting for selecting video standards >> between camera interface and external camera module? I mean ITU-R BT >> 601

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: > I've got one more thing to ask. > Is SoC camera framework supporting for selecting video standards > between camera interface and external camera module? I mean ITU-R BT > 601 and 656 things. > Or any different way that I'm not aware is supporte

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Magnus Damm
Hi Guennadi, On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, > review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a > (manually-created) quilt-series is at > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-17 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hello, I've got one more thing to ask. Is SoC camera framework supporting for selecting video standards between camera interface and external camera module? I mean ITU-R BT 601 and 656 things. Or any different way that I'm not aware is supported? On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Guennadi Liakhove

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: >> - I unload and reload mt9m111 and pxa_camera >> => not any better > > Actually, I think, in this case it should be found again, as long as you > reload pxa-camera while i2c-pxa is already loaded. Damn, you're right. I cross-checked, and reloading pxa_camera

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > > I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but > > otherwise > > it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination). > > Guennadi, > > I made some testing, and there is somethin

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik writes: > I need to make some additionnal tests with I2C loading/unloading, but > otherwise > it works perfectly for (soc_camera / pxa_camera /mt9m111 combination). Guennadi, I made some testing, and there is something I don't understand in the new device model. This is the test

Re: [PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-15 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, > review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a > (manually-created) quilt-series is at > http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next > history branch

[PATCH 0/5] soc-camera: convert to platform device

2009-04-15 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
This patch series is a preparation for the v4l2-subdev conversion. Please, review and test. My current patch-stack in the form of a (manually-created) quilt-series is at http://www.open-technology.de/download/20090415/ based on linux-next history branch, commit ID in -base file. Don't be su