> shouldn't there be a check when allocating jpg_hdr? or i am missing something?
>
>
> sd->jpeg_hdr = kmalloc(JPEG_HDR_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> jpeg_define(sd->jpeg_hdr, height, width, 0x21);
> jpeg_set_qual(sd->jpeg_hdr, sd->quality);
Yes probably there should be a check there. I'll one more min
Hi,
shouldn't there be a check when allocating jpg_hdr? or i am missing something?
sd->jpeg_hdr = kmalloc(JPEG_HDR_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
jpeg_define(sd->jpeg_hdr, height, width, 0x21);
jpeg_set_qual(sd->jpeg_hdr, sd->quality);
Best Regards.
Nice to see microdia project here :)
On Sat, Jul 18, 2
> - in the 1st patch, in gspca.c, why is the get_chip_ident check needed
> in vidioc_g_register / vidioc_s_register)?
>
According the the current v4l2 spec regarding the set and get
register ioctls drivers that support them must also support the get
chip ident ioctl. As such in the vidioc_s/g_re
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:51:41 -0400
Brian Johnson wrote:
> Mauro,
> Here is the updated version of the gspca sn9c20x subdriver.
>
> I've removed the custom debugging support and replaced it with support
> for the v4l2 debugging ioctls. The first patch in this set adds
> support to the gspca core
Mauro,
Here is the updated version of the gspca sn9c20x subdriver.
I've removed the custom debugging support and replaced it with support
for the v4l2 debugging ioctls. The first patch in this set adds support
to the gspca core for those ioctls. Also included are the fixes Hans
sent in his last em
