Yes, acked-by: Ralph Metzler
Jasmin J. writes:
> Hi!
>
> > I don't know if you are also waiting for a comment from me.
> All positive ones are welcome ;)
>
> > I am fine with those changes. They are even desperately needed
> > to get some "problem CAMs" working.
> THX, so we can interpr
Hi!
> I don't know if you are also waiting for a comment from me.
All positive ones are welcome ;)
> I am fine with those changes. They are even desperately needed
> to get some "problem CAMs" working.
THX, so we can interpret this as an "Acked-by"?
BR,
Jasmin
Hi,
I don't know if you are also waiting for a comment from me.
I am fine with those changes. They are even desperately needed
to get some "problem CAMs" working.
Regards,
Ralph
Jasmin J. writes:
> Ping 2!
>
> On 10/15/2017 03:59 PM, Jasmin J. wrote:
> > Ping!
> >
--
--
Ping 2!
On 10/15/2017 03:59 PM, Jasmin J. wrote:
> Ping!
>
Ping!
From: Jasmin Jessich
Some (older) CAMs are really slow in accepting data. I got sometimes the
already known error "CAM tried to send a buffer larger than the ecount
size". I could track it down to the dvb_ca_en50221_write_data function not
waiting between sending the data length high/low and d
