On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > Hi Guennadi,
> >
> > Ping ?
>
> Sorry again for a delay, and unfortunately my eventual reply won't be very
> helpful: we've modified our user-space in a way, that that path is
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Ping ?
Sorry again for a delay, and unfortunately my eventual reply won't be very
helpful: we've modified our user-space in a way, that that path isn't
triggered anymore, so, I cannot easily verify your patch. In any c
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Ping ?
Uhm, yes, that's bad. 1 month and a week. Sorry. I'll try to test this on
Monday.
Thanks
Guennadi
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 00:42:51 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Commit e93e7fd9f5a3fffec7792dbcc4c3574653eff
Hi Guennadi,
Ping ?
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 00:42:51 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Commit e93e7fd9f5a3fffec7792dbcc4c3574653effda7 ("v4l2: uvcvideo: Allow
> using larger buffers") reworked the buffer size sanity check at buffer
> completion time to use the frame size instead of the allocated buf
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 00:42:51 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Commit e93e7fd9f5a3fffec7792dbcc4c3574653effda7 ("v4l2: uvcvideo: Allow
> using larger buffers") reworked the buffer size sanity check at buffer
> completion time to use the frame size instead of the allocated buffer
> size. However, i
Commit e93e7fd9f5a3fffec7792dbcc4c3574653effda7 ("v4l2: uvcvideo: Allow
using larger buffers") reworked the buffer size sanity check at buffer
completion time to use the frame size instead of the allocated buffer
size. However, it introduced two bugs in doing so:
- it assigned the allocated buffer
