Em 27-04-2011 03:39, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Saturday, April 02, 2011 10:05:57 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Friday, April 01, 2011 19:12:02 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
>>> Some v4l drivers currently don't initialize their struct v4l2_subdev
>>> with zeros, and this is a problem since some of
On Saturday, April 02, 2011 10:05:57 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, April 01, 2011 19:12:02 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > Some v4l drivers currently don't initialize their struct v4l2_subdev
> > with zeros, and this is a problem since some of the v4l2 code expects
> > this. One example is
On Friday, April 01, 2011 19:12:02 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> Some v4l drivers currently don't initialize their struct v4l2_subdev
> with zeros, and this is a problem since some of the v4l2 code expects
> this. One example is the addition of internal_ops in commit 45f6f84,
> after that we a
Some v4l drivers currently don't initialize their struct v4l2_subdev
with zeros, and this is a problem since some of the v4l2 code expects
this. One example is the addition of internal_ops in commit 45f6f84,
after that we are at risk of random oopses with these drivers when code
in v4l2_device_regi
