Mauro
Since you still haven't pulled my fixes branch, and I have one more fix,
that I've posted a while ago but didn't commit to linuxtv.org. Can I now
push it to the same 2.6.37-rc3-fixes branch for you to pull from?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:09:09AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Guennadi Liakhovetski gmx.de> writes:
> > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > > When SOCAM_PCLK_SA
Hi Guennadi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:09:09AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski gmx.de> writes:
> > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset,
> > > > o
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski gmx.de> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset,
> > > otherwise we get
> > > the inverted behaviour.
> > Seems logical to me, that if this is true
Guennadi Liakhovetski gmx.de> writes:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset,
> > otherwise we get
> > the inverted behaviour.
> Seems logical to me, that if this is true, then you need the inverse:
>
> if (!(common_fla
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi linux-media,
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:03:52AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset, otherwise we
> > get
> > the inverted behaviour.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
>
> Trying my lu
Hi linux-media,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:03:52AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset, otherwise we
> get
> the inverted behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
Trying my luck again. Now adding Guennadi to Cc.
This is a real bug fix,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Baruch Siach wrote:
> When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset, otherwise we
> get
> the inverted behaviour.
Seems logical to me, that if this is true, then you need the inverse:
if (!(common_flags & SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING))
c
When SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING, just leave CSICR1_REDGE unset, otherwise we get
the inverted behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
---
drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c b/drivers/media/vide
