On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:35:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:35:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:35:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > For ov7725 it is a natural thing
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:35:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > For ov7725 it is a natural thing to do since it was originally
> > > developed for soc-camera a
Hi Guennadi,
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:35:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > For ov7725 it is a natural thing to do since it was originally
> > developed for soc-camera and it can easily do the following to access
> > platform data:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
[snip]
> For ov7725 it is a natural thing to do since it was originally
> developed for soc-camera and it can easily do the following to access
> platform data:
>
> struct soc_camera_link*icl = soc_camera_i2c_to_link(client);
> pdata = icl->priv;
Hi Guennadi.
Thanks for your help.
On 3 January 2012 16:05, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Javier
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
>
>> Guennadi,
>> probably you could answer me some question:
>>
>> as we agreed I'm trying to implement ENUM_INPUT support to soc-camera
>> through pa
Hi Javier
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, javier Martin wrote:
> Guennadi,
> probably you could answer me some question:
>
> as we agreed I'm trying to implement ENUM_INPUT support to soc-camera
> through pads.
No, you probably mean in the subdev driver, not in soc-camera core.
> This means I must be able
Guennadi,
probably you could answer me some question:
as we agreed I'm trying to implement ENUM_INPUT support to soc-camera
through pads. This means I must be able to pass the tvp5150 decoder
some platform_data in order to configure what inputs are really routed
in my board.
For that purpose I do
On 19-12-2011 09:25, javier Martin wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
>
Hi Mauro,
On Monday 19 December 2011 17:28:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On 19-12-2011 09:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> >>> On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote
On 19-12-2011 09:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
>>> On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> On 19 December 2011
>> I agree that input enumeration is needed, but I really think this should be
>> handled through pads, no with a new subdev operation. I don't like the idea
>> of
>> introducing a new operation that will already be deprecated from the very
>> beginning.
>>
>> Implementing this through pads isn't
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> > > On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> > > >> On 19 Dece
Hi,
On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> > On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> > >> On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >> > On Mo
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Guenna
On 19 December 2011 11:58, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
>
>> On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Guennadi,
>> >>
>> >> On Monday 19 December 2011 11:13:58 Guennadi L
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, javier Martin wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Guennadi,
> >>
> >> On Monday 19 December 2011 11:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wro
On 19 December 2011 11:41, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
>> Hi Guennadi,
>>
>> On Monday 19 December 2011 11:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > > On Monday 19 December 2011 09:09:34 Guennadi Liak
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Monday 19 December 2011 11:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 19 December 2011 09:09:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wr
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 19 December 2011 11:13:58 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2011 09:09:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Friday 16 December 2011 10:50:21 Guennadi
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Monday 19 December 2011 09:09:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 December 2011 10:50:21 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
Hi Javier,
On Monday 19 December 2011 08:44:58 javier Martin wrote:
> Hi,
> thank you for your comments.
>
> Let me try to summarize the conclusions we've agreed here:
> 1.- soc-camera can support S_INPUT as long as I provide backwards
> compatibility in case subdev does not support s_routing (i.
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 19 December 2011 09:09:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 16 December 2011 10:50:21 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
> > > > >> How about this implementation? I know it's not
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Friday 16 December 2011 10:50:21 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
> > > >> How about this implementation? I know it's not for soc, but I post it
> > > >> to give my idea.
> > > >> Bridge kno
Hi,
thank you for your comments.
Let me try to summarize the conclusions we've agreed here:
1.- soc-camera can support S_INPUT as long as I provide backwards
compatibility in case subdev does not support s_routing (i.e. I must
resend my patch returning input 0 in case s_routing is not supported).
Hi Guennadi,
On Friday 16 December 2011 10:50:21 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
> > >> How about this implementation? I know it's not for soc, but I post it
> > >> to give my idea.
> > >> Bridge knows the layout, so it doesn't need to query the subdevice.
>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
> >> How about this implementation? I know it's not for soc, but I post it
> >> to give my idea.
> >> Bridge knows the layout, so it doesn't need to query the subdevice.
> >
> > Where from? AFAIU, we are talking here about subdevice inputs, right? In
> > thi
On 16 December 2011 10:36, Scott Jiang wrote:
>>> How about this implementation? I know it's not for soc, but I post it
>>> to give my idea.
>>> Bridge knows the layout, so it doesn't need to query the subdevice.
>>
>> Where from? AFAIU, we are talking here about subdevice inputs, right? In
>> thi
>> How about this implementation? I know it's not for soc, but I post it
>> to give my idea.
>> Bridge knows the layout, so it doesn't need to query the subdevice.
>
> Where from? AFAIU, we are talking here about subdevice inputs, right? In
> this case about various inputs of the TV decoder. How sh
On 16 December 2011 09:47, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Javier
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Javier Martin wrote:
>
>> Some v4l-subdevs such as tvp5150 have multiple
>> inputs. This patch allows the user of a soc-camera
>> device to select between them.
>
> Sure, we can support it. But I've got a
On 16 December 2011 09:34, Scott Jiang wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Javier Martin :
>> Some v4l-subdevs such as tvp5150 have multiple
>> inputs. This patch allows the user of a soc-camera
>> device to select between them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martin
>> ---
>> drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c |
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Scott Jiang wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> > First question: you probably also want to patch soc_camera_g_input() and
> > soc_camera_enum_input(). But no, I do not know how. The video subdevice
> > operations do not seem to provide a way to query subdevice routing
> > capabilities
Hi Guennadi,
> First question: you probably also want to patch soc_camera_g_input() and
> soc_camera_enum_input(). But no, I do not know how. The video subdevice
> operations do not seem to provide a way to query subdevice routing
> capabilities, so, I've got no idea how we're supposed to support
Hi Javier
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Javier Martin wrote:
> Some v4l-subdevs such as tvp5150 have multiple
> inputs. This patch allows the user of a soc-camera
> device to select between them.
Sure, we can support it. But I've got a couple of remarks:
First question: you probably also want to patch s
2011/12/16 Javier Martin :
> Some v4l-subdevs such as tvp5150 have multiple
> inputs. This patch allows the user of a soc-camera
> device to select between them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martin
> ---
> drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletion
Some v4l-subdevs such as tvp5150 have multiple
inputs. This patch allows the user of a soc-camera
device to select between them.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martin
---
drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/soc
37 matches
Mail list logo
