On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Marton Balint wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Miroslav Šustek wrote:
>
> > Well this patch should solve it.
> >
> > I don't know how many samples are processed so:
> > First patch is for situation when N*N fits in s32.
> > Second one uses two divisions, but doesn't have any abnor
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Miroslav Šustek wrote:
> Well this patch should solve it.
>
> I don't know how many samples are processed so:
> First patch is for situation when N*N fits in s32.
> Second one uses two divisions, but doesn't have any abnormal restrictions for
> N.
Both patches are fine, beac
Well this patch should solve it.
I don't know how many samples are processed so:
First patch is for situation when N*N fits in s32.
Second one uses two divisions, but doesn't have any abnormal restrictions for N.
Personally I think that two divisions won't hurt. :)
- FILE: cx88-dsp_64bit_m
