On 10-12-2011 11:43, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Mauro,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
Devin,
You're over-reacting. This patch were a reply from Andreas to a thread,
and not a separate patch submission.
Patches like are generally handled as RFC, especially
Hello Mauro,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Devin,
>
> You're over-reacting. This patch were a reply from Andreas to a thread,
> and not a separate patch submission.
>
> Patches like are generally handled as RFC, especially since it doesn't
> contain a description
On 09-12-2011 23:37, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
On 10.12.2011 00:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 09-12-2011 21:37, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 09-12-2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
Could someone explain reason for that
On 10-12-2011 00:25, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Andreas,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
WTF, Devin, you again? I haven't asked anyone to upstream it. Feel free
to analyze the code and resubmit it.
1. It's marked with a subject line that starts with "[PATCH]"
2
Hello Andreas,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> WTF, Devin, you again? I haven't asked anyone to upstream it. Feel free
> to analyze the code and resubmit it.
1. It's marked with a subject line that starts with "[PATCH]"
2. It has your SIgned-Off-By line.
3. it was
On 10.12.2011 02:59, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 10.12.2011 00:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> On 09-12-2011 21:37, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 09-12-2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:11
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 10.12.2011 00:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> On 09-12-2011 21:37, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> On 09-12-2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>> Could
On 10.12.2011 00:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On 09-12-2011 21:37, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> On 09-12-2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>>> wrote:
> Could someone explain reason for that?
I dunno, but I thi