Em Sat, 21 Oct 2017 11:57:57 +0200
Daniel Scheller escreveu:
> Am Sat, 21 Oct 2017 11:28:10 +0200
> schrieb Ralph Metzler :
>
> > Daniel Scheller writes:
> > > From: Daniel Scheller
> > >
> > > When calling gate_ctrl() with enable=0 if previously the mutex
> > > wasn't locked (ie. on ena
Am Sat, 21 Oct 2017 11:28:10 +0200
schrieb Ralph Metzler :
> Daniel Scheller writes:
> > From: Daniel Scheller
> >
> > When calling gate_ctrl() with enable=0 if previously the mutex
> > wasn't locked (ie. on enable=1 failure and subdrivers not handling
> > this properly, or by otherwise bad
Daniel Scheller writes:
> From: Daniel Scheller
>
> When calling gate_ctrl() with enable=0 if previously the mutex wasn't
> locked (ie. on enable=1 failure and subdrivers not handling this properly,
> or by otherwise badly behaving drivers), the i2c_lock could be unlocked
I think drivers an
From: Daniel Scheller
When calling gate_ctrl() with enable=0 if previously the mutex wasn't
locked (ie. on enable=1 failure and subdrivers not handling this properly,
or by otherwise badly behaving drivers), the i2c_lock could be unlocked
consecutively which isn't allowed. Prevent this by keeping
