t; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Marek Szyprowski;
>> kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; Hiremath, Vaibhav; Karicheri,
>> Muralidharan; 'Guru Raj'; 'Xiaolin Zhang'; 'Magnus Damm'; 'Sakari
>> Ailus'
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC v2.1 0/2] Me
> kyungmin.p...@samsung.com; Hiremath, Vaibhav; Karicheri,
> Muralidharan; 'Guru Raj'; 'Xiaolin Zhang'; 'Magnus Damm'; 'Sakari
> Ailus'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC v2.1 0/2] Mem-to-mem device framework
>
> Hello Hans,
>
>
> On
Hello Hans,
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 16:06:18 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Thank you for working on this! It's much appreciated. Now I've noticed that
> patches regarding memory-to-memory and memory pool tend to get very few
> comments.
> I suspect that the main reason is that these are SoC-specif
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 14:17:32 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the second version of the proposed implementation for mem-to-mem
> memory
> device framework. Your comments are very welcome.
Hi Pawel,
Thank you for working on this! It's much appreciated. Now I've noticed that
pat
Hello,
this is the second version of the proposed implementation for mem-to-mem memory
device framework. Your comments are very welcome.
In v2.1:
I am very sorry for the resend, but somehow an orphaned endif found its way to
Kconfig during the rebase.
Changes since v1:
- v4l2_m2m_buf_queue() now
