On Friday 07 August 2009 13:03:22 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Thursday 06 August 2009 17:16:08 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > this patch moves the BKL one level down by removing the non-unlocked
> > > ioctl in v4l2-dev.c and calling lock_kerne
Hi Hans,
On Thursday 06 August 2009 17:16:08 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > this patch moves the BKL one level down by removing the non-unlocked
> > ioctl in v4l2-dev.c and calling lock_kernel/unlock_kernel in the
> > unlocked_ioctl handler if the driver only support
Hi Laurent,
> Hi everybody,
>
> this patch moves the BKL one level down by removing the non-unlocked ioctl
> in
> v4l2-dev.c and calling lock_kernel/unlock_kernel in the unlocked_ioctl
> handler
> if the driver only supports locked ioctl.
>
> Opinions/comments/applause/kicks ?
I've been thinking
Hi everybody,
this patch moves the BKL one level down by removing the non-unlocked ioctl in
v4l2-dev.c and calling lock_kernel/unlock_kernel in the unlocked_ioctl handler
if the driver only supports locked ioctl.
Opinions/comments/applause/kicks ?
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
diff -r 4533a406fddb
