On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:36:08 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> It is probably better to have it as a separate document like what you've
> proposed,
> so, could you please drop the duplicated information that is there and move
> any
> missing info that might not be on your new doc?
Yes, I ca
Hi Jon,
You probably lost my feedback.
I've added some time ago a videobuf description at
Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt.
It is probably better to have it as a separate document like what you've
proposed,
so, could you please drop the duplicated information that is there and move
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I've taken the liberty of dropping this into my docs-next tree, and
> will send it upward unless there are objections. Hopefully it's
> useful...
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the doc!
I'll take a more detailed review, but I've added already some bits about
videobuf at:
Documenta
I've taken the liberty of dropping this into my docs-next tree, and
will send it upward unless there are objections. Hopefully it's
useful...
jon
---
V4L2: Add a document describing the videobuf layer
Videobuf is a moderately complex API which most V4L2 drivers should use,
but its documentation
