On Fri September 14 2012 04:09:42 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 13-09-2012 21:59, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> > Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:23:42 -0300
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> >
> >> Em 13-09-2012 20:19, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> >>> Em Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0400
>
Em 13-09-2012 21:59, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:23:42 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>
>> Em 13-09-2012 20:19, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>>> Em Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0400
>>> Steven Toth escreveu:
>>>
Mauro, please read below, a new set of p
Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:23:42 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em 13-09-2012 20:19, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> > Em Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0400
> > Steven Toth escreveu:
> >
> >> Mauro, please read below, a new set of patches I'm submitting for merge.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 16,
Em 13-09-2012 20:19, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0400
> Steven Toth escreveu:
>
>> Mauro, please read below, a new set of patches I'm submitting for merge.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Thu August 16 2012 19:39:51 Steven Tot
On Sat August 18 2012 17:48:52 Steven Toth wrote:
> Mauro, please read below, a new set of patches I'm submitting for merge.
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Thu August 16 2012 19:39:51 Steven Toth wrote:
> >> >> So, I've ran v4l2-compliance and it pointed out a few
Mauro, please read below, a new set of patches I'm submitting for merge.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thu August 16 2012 19:39:51 Steven Toth wrote:
>> >> So, I've ran v4l2-compliance and it pointed out a few things that I've
>> >> fixed, but it also does a few things
On Thu August 16 2012 19:39:51 Steven Toth wrote:
> >> So, I've ran v4l2-compliance and it pointed out a few things that I've
> >> fixed, but it also does a few things that (for some reason) I can't
> >> seem to catch. One particular test is on (iirc) s_fmt. It attempts to
> >> set ATSC but by ioct
>> So, I've ran v4l2-compliance and it pointed out a few things that I've
>> fixed, but it also does a few things that (for some reason) I can't
>> seem to catch. One particular test is on (iirc) s_fmt. It attempts to
>> set ATSC but by ioctl callback never receives ATSC in the norm/id arg,
>> it a
On Thu August 16 2012 15:27:51 Steven Toth wrote:
> >> While I don't necessarily agree with Mauro that adoption of subdev is
> >> "MANDATORY" (in the larger sense of the kernel driver development -
> >> and common practices throughout the entire source base), I do hear and
> >> value your comments
>> While I don't necessarily agree with Mauro that adoption of subdev is
>> "MANDATORY" (in the larger sense of the kernel driver development -
>> and common practices throughout the entire source base), I do hear and
>> value your comments and concerns from a peer review perspective.
>
> You're aw
On Tue August 14 2012 17:07:55 Steven Toth wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Em 13-08-2012 12:49, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >> On Mon August 13 2012 16:46:45 Steven Toth wrote:
> >>> Hans,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Oh dear. I don't
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 13-08-2012 12:49, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>> On Mon August 13 2012 16:46:45 Steven Toth wrote:
>>> Hans,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>>
>>> Oh dear. I don't think you're going to like my response, but I think
>>> we know each
Em 13-08-2012 12:49, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Mon August 13 2012 16:46:45 Steven Toth wrote:
>> Hans,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Oh dear. I don't think you're going to like my response, but I think
>> we know each other well enough to realize that neither of us are
>> trying to antago
On Mon August 13 2012 16:46:45 Steven Toth wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Oh dear. I don't think you're going to like my response, but I think
> we know each other well enough to realize that neither of us are
> trying to antagonize or upset either other. We're simply stating ou
Hans,
Thanks for your feedback.
Oh dear. I don't think you're going to like my response, but I think
we know each other well enough to realize that neither of us are
trying to antagonize or upset either other. We're simply stating our
positions. Please read on.
> I went through this driver from
Hi Steve!
On Mon August 13 2012 01:16:30 Steven Toth wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> A new PCIe bridge driver below. It was released a couple of months ago
> to the public, probably about time
> we got this into the request queue. I'll review the linux-firmware
> additions shortly, I have a firmware blob
Hi Mauro,
A new PCIe bridge driver below. It was released a couple of months ago
to the public, probably about time
we got this into the request queue. I'll review the linux-firmware
additions shortly, I have a firmware blob
and flexible license for the distros.
The following changes since commit
17 matches
Mail list logo
