On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I
> > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagate
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
>> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
>
> So, now we have two patches for slig
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
* http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linu
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressio
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let t
Hi
On Friday 30 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let th
