Hi,
On 02/24/2010 03:32 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
Where necessary libv4l currently has code snippets like:
#ifndef V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501
#define V4L2_PIX_FMT_SPCA501 v4l2_fourcc('S','5','0','1') /* YUYV per line */
#endif
I don't think this i
Hello all,
On 02/23/2010 10:51 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
dougsland
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
I know that was mentioned then, but re-thinking this, as this will all
be Linux specific, I don't really see a need for autotools atm, and as
I personally find autotools a bit overcomplicated. I would like to try
just using plain Makefile
On 13:55 Wed 24 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >Hans de Goede wrote:
> >The better here is to have the latest kernel headers copied on the tree.
> >This way, it is possible to compile libv4l2 with an older kernel version and
> >later upgrade
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
> linuxtv.org ?
>>
> Hi,
>
> On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
> linuxtv.org ?
I added it. I
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
> linuxtv.
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 01:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me,
Hi,
On 02/24/2010 07:05 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for comm
On 16:51 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> >>Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
> >>linuxtv.org ?
> >
> >I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil
> >and dougs
Am Dienstag, den 23.02.2010, 13:45 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Brandon Philips wrote:
> >> On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 18:24 Sat 23 Ja
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto
>>> linuxtv.org ?
>>
>> I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and
>> dougsland.
>>
>
> I see
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 04:37 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and dougsland.
I see good, thanks! Can someone (Douglas ?) with bette
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ok, so this will give me a local tree, how do I get this onto linuxtv.org ?
I added it. In thesis, it is open for commit to you, me, hverkuil and dougsland.
The tree is small: just 860Kb, after properly packed.
Brandon, I need an ssh public key from you to enable your acc
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
make the download/clone bigger ?
>>> There aren't any big advantages on merging, nor there are big advantages on
>>> keeping
>>> them
Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> That's said, if all the issues are the ones listed above, I can try
>> to address them on the next months, to put it into a better
>> shape. That's said, I don't think we should have
Manu Abraham wrote:
>>> What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
>>> make the download/clone bigger ?
>> There aren't any big advantages on merging, nor there are big advantages on
>> keeping
>> them alone.
>>
>> Advantages to merge:
>>- One single release cont
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>
>> What's the advantage in merging the dvb and v4l2 utils, other than to
>> make the download/clone bigger ?
>
> There aren't any big advanta
Manu Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> lib/
>>>libv4l1/
>>>
Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I would call it media-utils. A nice name and it reflects that it contains
>> both dvb and v4l utilities.
>>
>
> Well, the judge is still out on also adding the dvb utils to this git repo.
> I'm neutral on that issue, but I will need a co-maintainer for those bits
> if they
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
>>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was
> merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports
> v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we
> should also mer
Manu Abraham wrote:
>> and we've got some comments at the mailing list. Btw, the patches
>> I added there also adds DVB-S2 support to szap/scan, but tests
>> are needed, since I don't have any satellite dish nowadays.
>
>
> Btw, I did spend time to review your code before it is pulled in. You
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> lib/
>> libv4l1/
>> libv4l2/
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> lib/
>> libv4l1/
>> libv4l2/
>>
Hi,
On 02/23/2010 10:01 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
> Hi,
>
> On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everythi
Hi,
On 02/22/2010 11:54 PM, Brandon Philips wrote:
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
git clo
On 22:12 Mon 22 Feb 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
> >> no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
> >> clutter up the git tree with dead code?
> >>
> >> [1] http://
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> According to the wiki[1] these tools are without a maintainer. So, if
>> no one cares about them enough to make releases why merge them and
>> clutter up the git tree with dead code?
>>
>> [1] http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxTV_dvb-apps
>
> That's weird.
Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
>>> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> lib/
> libv4l1/
> libv4l2/
> libv4lconvert/
> utils/
> v4l2-dbg
> v4l2-ctl
On 00:26 Tue 23 Feb 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
> > On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > >lib/
> > > > libv4l1/
> > > > libv4l2/
> > > > libv4lconvert/
> > > >utils/
> > > > v4l2-dbg
> > > > v4l2-ctl
> > > > cx18-ctl
> > > >
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:54:26 Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >lib/
> > > libv4l1/
> > > libv4l2/
> > > libv4lconvert/
> > >utils/
> > > v4l2-dbg
> > > v4l2-ctl
> > > cx18-ctl
> > > ivtv-ctl
> > >contrib/
> > > test/
> > > everythi
On 18:24 Sat 23 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >lib/
> > libv4l1/
> > libv4l2/
> > libv4lconvert/
> >utils/
> > v4l2-dbg
> > v4l2-ctl
> > cx18-ctl
> > ivtv-ctl
> >contrib/
> > test/
> > everything else
> >
git clone git://ifup.org/philips/create-v4l-utils.gi
Hi,
On 01/24/2010 01:42 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there sin
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>
>
>
>
>>> Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
>>> For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
>>> since it is there since the first definition.
>>
>> Most a
Hi,
On 01/21/2010 08:23 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Yes, but, as we have also non-c code, some rules there don't apply.
For example the rationale for not using // comments don't apply to c++,
since it is there since the first definition.
Most apps are already in 'kernel' style. The main exce
Hi all,
On 01/21/2010 08:34 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Brandon Philips wrote:
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
A
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Brandon Philips wrote:
>> So here is how I see v4l-utils.git being laid out based on what others
>> have said:
>>
>> libv4l1/
>> libv4l2/
>> libv4lconv
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Brandon Philips wrote:
I've different experience in the projects with git I've used, as
long as there are some governance rules (like never ever push -f,
always do a rebase fix your stuff and
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Brandon Philips wrote:
> > > On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >>> As we're discussing about having a
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:07:32 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Brandon Philips wrote:
> > On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
> >>> maybe the better is to
Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> OTOH, since with git it is common to have multiple branches
>>> within one repository, I'm not sure how it works. It would
>>> be cool if git would support per-branch descriptions,
>>> and git web could display them.
>> I d
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > OTOH, since with git it is common to have multiple branches
> > within one repository, I'm not sure how it works. It would
> > be cool if git would support per-branch descriptions,
> > and git web could display them.
>
> I don't think git suppor
On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Brandon Philips wrote:
> > On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
> >>> maybe the better is to port it to
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> may I humbly request to make it mandatory to enter a description
> when a user creates a new tree on linuxtv.org?
> IMHO "foobar development repository" isn't useful at all.
Ok, I changed the git-menu script to ask for the description before
creating the clone
Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
>>> maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
>>> preserve the log history).
>
> I
On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
> >maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
> >preserve the log history).
I have a small script I used to con
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
that we find
a way to handle the few cases where we have "example" applications at
the media docs.
Note that v4l2-apps also contains libv
Thank you, Mauro, for doing this work! It is highly appreciated!
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@
Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> 4) v4l2-apps - I agree that splitting it could be a good idea, provided
>>> that we find
>>> a way to handle the few cases where we have "example" applications at
>>> the media docs.
>> Note that v4l2-apps also contains libv4l, it so happens that I've been
>> discussing
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2010-01-19:
>> Yes. I personally prefer to have a bare clone (bare trees have just
>> the -git objects, and not a workig tree), and several working copies.
>> I do the work at the working copies, and, after they are fine, I push
>> into the bare and
Andy Walls wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 01:29 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Andy Walls wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>>>
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
>>> Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compre
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Devin,
> I totally agree with you here. We obviously don't support developers who
> still
> want to use a 2.4.x kernel on their computer, so a line as to be drawn at
> some
> point.
Currently, the backport starts on 2.6.16. I think it is ok to keep this as the
bas
Hi Devin,
I think Mauro made it quite clear that this was just an announcement for work
in progress that has been started on git support and that we still need to
discuss how we will handle backports/compatibility with older kernels, so I'll
go straight to the point I want to make.
On Tuesday
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> >
> >> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
> >
> > Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
> >
> > 365 MiB * 2^2
Hi,
On 01/20/2010 10:54 AM, Paulo Assis wrote:
Hi,
The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
patching
uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add
Moin Andy,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>
> > BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
>
> Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
>
> 365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5333
Hi,
> The uvcdynctrl utility is part of the libwebcam project:
> http://www.quickcamteam.net/software/libwebcam
>
> But given that libwebcam is unmaintained and not used by anything AFAIK, I'm
> patching
> uvcdynctrl to no longer need it. The plan is to add uvcdynctrl to libv4l
> soon, as that
> i
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 09:36:08 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>
>
> >> I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independe
Hi Hans,
> Hi,
>
> On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git:
>>> v4l2-apps,
>>> possibly some firmware build code (
Hi,
On 01/19/2010 12:08 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
I do have one proposal: parts of our hg tree are independent of git: v4l2-apps,
possibly some firmware build code (not 100% sure of that), v4l_exper
Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2010-01-19:
> Yes. I personally prefer to have a bare clone (bare trees have just
> the -git objects, and not a workig tree), and several working copies.
> I do the work at the working copies, and, after they are fine, I push
> into the bare and send the branches from bare to
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 01:29 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> >
> >> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
> >
> > Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
> >
> >
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 02:10 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:38 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> >
> > > BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
> >
> > Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed,
Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>
>> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
>
> Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
>
> 365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5 bits/sec / 3600 sec/hr =
> 15.95
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:38 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>
> > BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
>
> Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
>
> 365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:10 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*.
Assuming 53.333 kbps download speed, 0% overhead, no compression:
365 MiB * 2^20 bytes/MiB * 8 bits/byte / 5 bits/sec / 3600 sec/hr =
15.95 hours
:(
Can git resume aborted
Hi Bob,
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 13:21 -0800 schrieb Bob Cunningham:
> On 01/19/2010 04:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> >> Hello Mauro,
> >>
> >> I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled "ANNOUNCE" instead
> >> of "RFC". It shows how little you ca
Hi,
may I humbly request to make it mandatory to enter a description
when a user creates a new tree on linuxtv.org?
IMHO "foobar development repository" isn't useful at all.
If I look at http://linuxtv.org/hg/ many times I have no
clue what a repo is about or why it exists at all.
Let's not repea
On 01/19/2010 04:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled "ANNOUNCE" instead
of "RFC". It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how
Hello Hans,
n 01/19/2010 05:53 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi,
Today, a step to the future was given, in order to help developers to better
do their work: the addition of -git support at linuxtv.org server.
This is one idea that
Hi Mauro,
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 14:07:39 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
> > dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and
> > now have trouble push
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
> dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and now
> have trouble pushing changes:
>
> $ git push -v uvcvideo
> Pushing to git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcv
Hi Mauro,
I've started playing with the linuxtv git repositories. I've cloned v4l-
dvb.git into git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git using git-menu and now
have trouble pushing changes:
$ git push -v uvcvideo
Pushing to git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git
fatal: The remote end hung up u
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
>> mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it,
>> is
>> that one developer now can do a
Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi Devin,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>> I want to focus my development on v4l-dvb. That said, I want a stable
>> codebase on which I can write v4l-dvb drivers, without having to worry
>> about whether or not my wireless driver is screwe
> So am I. I hope the future will prove us right :-)
:)
> How do your new git scripts process commits ? In particular, does the
> "Priority:" line still applies ?
For patches imported from -hg, the script will handle Priority. For patches
generated against -git, maybe the better is to have sepa
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> Hello Mauro,
>
> I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled "ANNOUNCE" instead
> of "RFC". It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
> of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how the
> process can be improved and soliciting
Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 08:53:10 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> He already started doing that, fixing some incompatibility troubles
>>> between some drivers and older kernels.
>> Mauro, I just wanted to thank
Hi Devin,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[..]
I want to focus my development on v4l-dvb. That said, I want a stable
codebase on which I can write v4l-dvb drivers, without having to worry
about whether or not my wireless driver is screwed up this week, or
whether the ALSA guys br
Hi Mauro,
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 12:12:58 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > I would like to personally thank you for spending time on git support at
> > linuxtv.org. Git support was a long-awaited feature for many developers
> > (and I certainly was o
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it, is
that one developer now
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
>
> BTW: I just made a clone of the git-tree - 365MB *ouff*. Maybe it's worth to
> mention right now, that one big difference to HG in the way we have used it,
> is
> that one developer now can do all the work only with one clon
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> I would like to personally thank you for spending time on git support at
> linuxtv.org. Git support was a long-awaited feature for many developers (and
> I
> certainly was one of them).
>
> All the work done behind the scene on linuxtv.org isn't seen by
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Due to that, I'm delegating the task of keeping -hg in sync with upstream
>> and backporting
>> patches to run on older kernels to another person: Douglas has offered his
>> help to keep
>> the tree
Hello Mauro,
I find it somewhat unfortunate that this is labeled "ANNOUNCE" instead
of "RFC". It shows how little you care about soliciting the opinions
of the other developers. Rather than making a proposal for how the
process can be improved and soliciting feedback, you have chosen to
decide f
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 08:53:10 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > He already started doing that, fixing some incompatibility troubles
> > between some drivers and older kernels.
>
> Mauro, I just wanted to thank you for doing all the
Hi Mauro,
I would like to personally thank you for spending time on git support at
linuxtv.org. Git support was a long-awaited feature for many developers (and I
certainly was one of them).
All the work done behind the scene on linuxtv.org isn't seen by end-users and
can thus be less rewarding
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 06:34:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, a step to the future was given, in order to help developers to better
> do their work: the addition of -git support at linuxtv.org server.
>
> This is one idea that is being recurrent along the last years: to start
Hi,
Today, a step to the future was given, in order to help developers to better
do their work: the addition of -git support at linuxtv.org server.
This is one idea that is being recurrent along the last years: to start using
-git
as our primary resource for managing the patches at the developme
91 matches
Mail list logo
